Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (9)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (10) (remove)
Keywords
- Paris Agreement (2)
- Baltic states (1)
- Baltische Staaten (1)
- Betriebswirtschaftslehre (1)
- Bretton Woods (1)
- Climate change (1)
- Conference (1)
- EU ECTS (1)
- EU ETS (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Euro-Zone (1)
- European Emissions Trading Scheme (1)
- European climate strategy (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Forest carbon (1)
- Forest carbon sequestration (1)
- Fulda (1)
- Fulda / Hochschule Fulda (1)
- Germany (1)
- Greece (1)
- Griechenland (1)
- Haftung (1)
- Hu-manitarian performance (1)
- Humanitäre Hilfe (1)
- IMF (1)
- Jordan (1)
- Management (1)
- Proceedings (1)
- Russia (1)
- SCOR (1)
- Saint Petersburg (1)
- Sankt Petersburg / Staatliche Universität Sankt-Petersburg (1)
- Schuldenkrise (1)
- Supply Chain Management (1)
- Trade barriers (1)
- Video conference (1)
- Videokonferenz (1)
- Wissenschaft (1)
- World Bank (1)
- debt crisis (1)
- euro area (1)
- exposure (1)
- forest carbon credits (1)
- global financial architecture (1)
- humanitarian aid (1)
- humanitarian logistics (1)
- multilateralism (1)
- offsetting (1)
- performance measurement (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaft (10) (remove)
Abstract
Forest-based carbon credits are crucial in most Emissions Trading Schemes as they offer a cost-efficient means of offsetting hard-to-abate emissions. To date, this has not been the case in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). However with the Paris Agreement rulebook now finalized, there could be an opportunity to revive this flexibility mechanism in European climate policy. Based on 24 expert interviews, we examined the forest potential within the EU ETS across short, medium, and long-term time frames. We found that the compliance system will remain blocked until 2030, but there is a greater likelihood of transitioning towards the inclusion of forest-based removals and reductions in the long term. Although forestry projects have faced significant reluctance in the EU, there is unanimous agreement on the importance of both technological solutions and such initiatives for climate protection. To fully leverage the potential of forest activity in the future, it will be necessary to adopt different methods and tools (e.g., liability regimes), stricter legislation on socio-economic factors (e.g., land use rights), overcoming implementation hurdles (e.g., do not compromise deterrence through mitigation), and maintaining an open political stance. This study provides a comprehensive perspective on the barriers and potentials of forestry projects within the compliance system of the EU which is essential to be addressed when re-opening the discussion on future eligibility. The implication of the findings suggest an immediate start to adopt to the barriers for carbon credit readiness in the next phase of the EU ETS beginning of 2030.
Climate change is a global challenge, with estimated mitigation costs ranging from $1.6 to $3.8 trillion per year. As a pioneer in climate action, the European Union has the most exten-sive emissions trading system worldwide (90% of the global value of $759 billion in 2021). In this paper, we review the European Union's climate strategy, emphasizing the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) development, and the role of tropical forest carbon credits for off-setting. We argue that the European Union continues to leave a significant potential of trop-ical forests as natural carbon sinks unattended. In contrast, we reveal that the regulators can learn from the experiences made in the past and the finalization of the rulebook for Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. We present a proposal on changes to the EU ETS regulation by con-verting the European Commission's proposal to increase the linear reduction factor from 2.2% to 4.2% to the eligibility of forest carbon credits, resulting in additional funding poten-tial for forestry projects to increase necessary carbon sinks. Simultaneously, allowing flexibil-ity of investing to a limited extent in neutralization projects mitigates the risk of overstress-ing regulated companies to reach the emission reduction targets.
Abstract
Over the course of the European Sovereign Debt Crisis members of the euro area have put up significant resources to stabilize the financial situation of a few fellow member states. In Germany, this support is subject to a controversial discussion. One aspect in that is the extent of support provided. Using the financial assistance provided to Greece as an example, this paper sheds some light on the financial burden for Germany in comparison to other member states of the euro area, especially Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. This implies not only an interesting comparison of strains between large and small economies but also between original and later euro area members.
Keywords: euro area, debt crisis, exposure, Greece, Baltic states, Germany
The research papers published in this reader were presented to an audience of academicians and practitioners at the 2011 Global Business Management Research Conference at Fulda University. The conference was conducted under the topic “Recent Developments in Business Management Research in an International and Regional Context”.
Based on a first video conference: small and middle sized companies in Russia and Germany: A comparative view organized by University "Interregional Institute of Economics and Law", Saint Petersburg/Russia and the University of Applied Sciences – Faculty of Business, Fulda/Germany held on 20th May 2010. Both institutes decided to organize a follow-up conference on January 27th 2011. Again the focus was to compare both markets for international operating companies in reasons for going abroad. The following papers are the outcome of this conference and were presented on the one hand by Fulda master students and on the other hand by Master Students from Saint Petersburg. The overall focus was again a comparative work from a company point of view. Hereby the main research question was to present different case studies based on a heterogeneous group of German-based companies in terms of size and branches. Success and failure in international management activities are discussed on an empirical and statistical basis. Furthermore the students from both institutes learnt also some practical matters like for example how can a foreign company establish its legal presence in Russia?
This article looks critically at the explanation provided by the so‐called ‘normalisation’
literature for Germany’s apparent reluctance and closefisted approach to the Eurozone crisis.
In contrast to the ‘normalisation’ argument which attributes the handling of the crisis to a more self‐interested and assertive stance in Germany’s European policy, this paper emphasizes the role of economic ideas as an explanatory factor. Based on the economic school of ordoliberalism in Germany, the crisis is perceived of as a debt and institutional crisis rather than a financial crisis, as suggested by ‘normalisation’ proponents. Consequently, a profound long‐term solution is thought to require policies of debt reduction and supply‐side reform as well as amendments to Eurozone institutions. In addition, unconditional financial bail‐outs are deemed inadequate to fight the source of the crisis. While the ‘normalisation’ literature stresses change in Germany’s approach to European integration relative to the early 1990s, the view outlined here suggests that there is a significant degree of continuity with the founding period of the European Economic and Monetary Union. Both then and now, Germany is primarily concerned with sound money, fiscal discipline and the institutional set‐up of the Eurozone, all based on principles derived from ordoliberal economic thinking.
The two Bretton Woods Sisters – International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank – have been key actors in the international political economy since their inception in 1944. While the IMF was established to support national economies during rather short-term, macroeconomic crises, the World Bank has had a more long-term focus on development and economic growth. In pursuit of their goals, both institutions’ instrumental repertoire includes the provision of information, surveillance, technical assistance and training, policy advice, and – arguably most importantly – lending to those countries that have limited or no access to private capital markets. In this paper, I critically analyse the Bretton Woods sisters’ institutional set-up, their objectives and instruments. Further, various criticisms and challenges of the multilateral system are discussed, including the economic policy conditions imposed on borrowing countries, the Western-dominated governance structure and the under-representation of major emerging economies such as China and India.
The research papers published in this reader were presented to an audience of academicians and practitioners at several international business research conferences. All of the submitted articles and presentations abstracts were subject to a review by the Editorial Board of the conference, comprised of the following persons: Prof. Dr. Klaus Kellner (Universitiy of Applied Science Augsburg, Germany), Prof. em. Dr. Johannes Lachhammer (Augsburg University, Germany) and Prof. Guenther Kress, PhD, California State University. The Editorial Board also reviewed and approved the submitted full papers for publication in this reader. This reader intends to sustainably stimulate the discussion concerning recent developments in Business Management Research among scholars and practitioners. Each and every feedback, also and particularly from students, is most welcome.
The 1st Jordanian Conference on Logistics in the Mashreq Region was organized within the framework of the research project “JOINOLOG”, funded by the German Ministry of Education and Science.
The project’s conclusion and introduction to an audience of peers was the 1st Jordanian Conference on Logistics in the Mashreq Region (JCLM1), conducted on November 14th and 15th, 2023. These are the proceedings of this final event. They consolidate the shared efforts of all participants and speakers in JCLM1. The collection of these scientific results aims to promote logistical sciences and its transfer into application, which is reflected by their multidimensional presentation in this document.